-- Letter from MCmailteam International

We hope you're ok.


After having submitted OUR ELECTRONIC TORTURE, ABUSE AND EXPERIMENTATION CASES and numerous other letters & Petitions detailing the most extreme and totalitarian violations of human rights in human history to most Governments, Security/Intelligence Agencies, International Organizations, Religious Organisations, Human Rights Organizations, Universities, Scientific and other Institutions, and the International Media all over the world - over and over and over again - appealing for assistance, protection and/or publicity we have received the responses listed below.

Other TARGETED INDIVIDUALS, all over the world, who are being subjected to similar torture and abuse, have had their appeals for justice, protection, assistance and/or publicity similarly almost completely ignored and/or suppressed – whether presented as GROUP PETITIONS or INDIVIDUALLY!!

Some of our ELECTRONIC TORTURE, ABUSE AND EXPERIMENTATION CASES detail the most extreme and totalitarian violations of human rights in human history, including the most horrendous psychological tortures, rapes, sexual abuse, surgical mutilations, ‘mind control’, and other mental and physical mutilations:-

There are MANY, MANY others, all over the world, who are being subjected to similar torture and abuse.

These are extreme and monstrous CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY – indescribably terrible in themselves – coupled with the ORWELLIAN secrecy and denial of any support at all that we are experiencing, makes them even more horrendous and monstrous.

Some TARGETED INDIVIDUALS have been attempting to gain assistance, protection and/or publicity about these crimes since the 1990s - and even earlier - this extends as far back into the history of illegal "scientific and medical" testing and experimentation as COINTELPRO, MKULTRA and the DUPLESSIS ORPHANS - and further.

Yours in the search for openness and respect for universal human rights
John Finch, 5/8 Kemp St, Thornbury, Vic 3071, Australia, TEL: 0424009627


THE RESPONSES - 2004-2016:-


Application no. 48661/06

"Dear Sir

I write to inform you that on 15 May 2007 the European Court of Human Rights, sitting as a Committee of three judges (E. Myjer, President, E.Fura-Sandstrom and I.Ziemele) pursuant to Article 27 of the Convention, decided under Article 28 of the Convention to declare the above application inadmissable because it did not comply with the requirements set out in Articles 34 and 35 of the Convention.

In the light of all the material in its possession, and in so far as the matters complained of were within its competence, the Court found that they did not disclose any appearance of a violation of the rights and freedoms set out in the Convention or its Protocols.

This decision is final and not subject to any appeal to either the Court, including its Grand Chamber, or any other body. You will therefore appreciate that the Registry will be unable to provide any further details about the Committee's deliberations or to conduct further correspondence relating to its decision in this case. You will receive no further documents from the Court concerning this case and, in accordance with the Court's instructions, the file will be destroyed one year after the date of the decision.

The present communication is made pursuant to Rule 53 & 2 of the Rules of Court.

yours faithfully
For the Committee
S. Naismith Deputy Section Registrar" 2006



"Dear Mr. Finch,

I am writing in reference to your e-mail to the President of the European Parliament.

On behalf of Mr Hans-Gert Pöttering, I thank you for the information you have provided and I can assure you that it has been noted and read with interest.

While the European Parliament supports research activities aimed at creating the knowledge society and strengthening the scientific and technological bases of the Community industry, it has always pointed out the need to respect fundamental ethical principles, including those reflected in the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union. With regard to the seventh Framework Programme of the European Community for research, technological development and demonstration activities (2007 to 2013), the Parliament has stated in particular that the opinions of the European Group on Ethics in Science and New Technologies are and will continue to be taken into account. You may wish to read more details at the following Internet addresses:

Yours sincerely,
Jean-Louis COUGNON
Head of Division
European Parliament
General Directorate for Information
Correspondence with Citizens Unit" 2007


“Dear Sir, Madam

The Office of the Prosecutor of the International Criminal Court acknowledges receipt of you documents/letter.

This communication has been duly entered in the Communications Register of the Office. We will give consideration to this communication, as appropriate, in accordance with the provisions of the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court.

As soon as a decision is reached, we will inform you, in writing, and provide you with reasons for this decision.

Yours sincerely

….(illegible) …..

Head of Information and Evidence Unit
Office of the Prosecutor” 2007

see below for their written “decision”.


"Dear Mr. Finch:

Thank you for contacting the Citizens Commission on Human Rights International.

Your abuse documentation is now in our data files. A pattern of abuse may be established by amassing documentation such as yours.

Please understand that CCHR is not a law enforcement or legal agency in any way. We are not an attorney referral service, cannot bring lawsuits against individuals and do not have law enforcement powers. However, we do work with such officials by gathering information such as yours, filing complaints, offering research and other assistance. Any actions performed by CCHR are done as a free public service--we do not charge for our services.

If you decide that you want to file a complaint against a specific psychiatrist or facility, you should send us a full written statement with specific information – names, dates, places, etc. describing the abuse that occurred. If you have questions upon reviewing this letter please contact us.

You can find a wealth of information on psychiatric abuse at website


Lorita O'Leary, CCHR Abuse Case Documenter
Citizens Commission on Human Rights International
6616 Sunset Blvd. Los Angeles, CA 90028
(800) 869-CCHR (2247)


"Dear all,

This is just to let everyone know we do take this phenomenon seriously and are looking into ways in which we can convince relevant people to take it seriously as well. We would like to thank all the people who have send in their stories, and will keep you informed if not directly then through Monika Stoces.

Hiermit möchten wir allen wissen lassen das wir dieses phenomen ernst nimmen und versuchen werden andere relevante personen es auch ernst nemen zu lassen. Wir mochten auch gern jeden danken die ihre geschichten gemaild hatten, wir sollen sie informieren uber unsere befindungen von hier oder via Monika Stoces.

kind regards,
Gert Nuyts (assistent)
Patsy Sörensen,Payoke NGO
Leguit 4,2000 Antwerpen, Belgium
T. 0032-3-201.16.90


17/4/08 - no response at all although they have recently filed the following "tip-of-the-iceberg" lawsuit:-

"CCR Files Suit over NSA Domestic Spying Program
Center for Constitutional Rights Believes Privileged Attorney-Client Communications Were Intercepted by NSA without Warrants


In New York, on January 17, 2006, the Center for Constitutional Rights (CCR) filed a lawsuit against President George W. Bush, the head of the National Security Agency (NSA), and the heads of the other major security agencies, challenging the NSA's surveillance of persons within the United States without judicial approval or statutory authorization. The suit seeks an injunction that would prohibit the government from conducting warrantless surveillance of communications in the U.S. CCR filed the suit in the Federal District Court for the Southern District of New York on its own behalf and on behalf of CCR attorneys and legal staff representing clients who fit the criteria described by the Attorney General for targeting under the NSA Surveillance Program.

As has been widely reported, for over four years the NSA, with the approval of the president, has engaged in a program of widespread warrantless electronic surveillance of telephone calls and emails in violation of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA). The suit argues that the NSA Surveillance Program violates a clear criminal law, exceeds the president's authority under Article II of the Constitution, and violates the First and Fourth Amendments. The Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act explicitly authorizes foreign intelligence electronic surveillance only upon orders issued by federal judges on a special court. It expressly authorizes warrantless wiretapping only for the first fifteen days of a war, and makes it a crime to engage in wiretapping without specific statutory authority. Rather than seeking to amend this statute, the president simply violated it by authorizing warrantless wiretapping of Americans without statutory authority or court approval. As a result,the President violated his oath of office to take care that the laws of this nation are faithfully executed, and instead secretly violated a criminal prohibition duly enacted by Congress.

CCR has been one of the most active opponents of the illegal detention, torture and intelligence gathering practices this administration instituted in the wake of the terrorist attacks of 9/11. As part of its mission to fight violations of the Bill of Rights and the Constitution, the Center for Constitutional Rights represents hundreds of men detained indefinitely without charge as "enemy combatants" at Guantanamo Bay; Maher Arar, a Canadian citizen accused of al Qaeda ties and rendered from the United States to Syria for the purpose of being tortured; and Muslim immigrants unreasonably and wrongfully detained in the U.S. for months without probable cause or criminal charges in the wake of 9/11.

In the course of representing these clients, the Center's lawyers have engaged in innumerable telephone calls and e-mails with people outside the United States, including their clients, their clients'families and outside lawyers, potential witnesses, and others. Given that the government has accused many of CCR's overseas clients of being associated with Al Qaeda or of interest to the 9/11 investigation, there is little question that these attorneys have been subject to the NSA Surveillance Program. The Center filed today's lawsuit in order to protect CCR attorneys' right to represent their clients free of unlawful and unchecked surveillance.

CCR Legal Director Bill Goodman said, "On this, the day following Martin Luther King Day, we are saddened that the illegal electronic surveillance that once targeted that great American has again become characteristic of our present government. As was the case with Dr. King, this illegal activity is cloaked in the guise of national security. In reality, it reflects an attempt by the Bush Administration to exercise unchecked power without the inconvenient interference of the other co-equal branches of government."

According to CCR attorney Shayana Kadidal, "The mere existence of the program harms CCR and our attorneys because it serves to inhibittheir ability to institute and effectively litigate these suits."

The Center for Constitutional Rights is represented in the suit by CCR attorneys Bill Goodman, Shayana Kadidal, and Michael Ratner, and CCR cooperating attorney David Cole. Also appearing as an attorney
for CCR, is Professor Michael Avery, president of the National Lawyers Guild (NLG), on behalf of the NLG." 2007



“October 10, 2007
Dear Member of the Legislature and Friends:

This letter is to ask for your help for the many constituents in our country who are being affected unjustly by electronic weapons torture and covert harassment groups. Serious privacy rights violations and physical injuries have been caused by the activities of these groups and their use of so-called non-lethal weapons on men, women, and even children.

I am asking you to play a role in helping these victims and also stopping the massive movement in the use of Verichip and RFID technologies in tracking Americans. . . . . .”

Representative Jim Guest EMAIL: ,


Mr Andrew Nunn
Correspondence Secretary
to the Archbishop of Canterbury

OUR REF: 63443
22 MAY 2008
Mr Rudy Andria
Paris, France

Dear Mr Andria

The Archbishop of Canterbury has asked me to write thanking you for your 19th May letter, but to say with regret that he is not in a position to help. He is sorry about that.

Yours Sincerely


14. MEETING WITH MR NIGEL FARRAGE, MEMBER OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT, from UKIP ( United Kingdom Independence and Democracy Party), BRUSSELS, EUROPE 24/6/08

From: FARAGE Nigel
Date: 24 jun. 2008 17:38
To: Monika Stoces

Dear Monika Stoces

Thank you for your mailing - and good luck with your demo at the Strasbourg-site! If you would like to send two people into the buildings, I shall gladly meet them at the entrance to the LOW-building, on Tuesday or Wednesday afternoon, and provide them with passes. I should be interested to have a chat.

Please call (0033) 3881 77855 or (0032) 473 622 454, when delegation is ready to enter.

Yours sincerely
Andrew S. Reed
(Office of Nigel Farage)


Dear All
Despite the relatively small number of participants ( 19 ), all in all the Strasburg demo was quite a success. The majority of the victims present were from Germany:
Germany: 9, Italy: 3, Switzerland: 2, Belgium: 2, France:1, Austria: 1 and Morocco: 1
As agreed, Swetlana and Walter Madliger had a chat with Andrew Reed of the Office of MP Nigel Farage. A detailed summary of the meeting will be posted later.
French FR3 TV kept their promise to me and came on Monday 7th to interview us and to film the demo.
This demo not only gave us an intense sense of pleasure and enjoyment of fighting together, but this in turn made us more than ready to indulge in that most human of activities - social interaction- the sharing of experiences and the simple but enduring pleasure of enjoying each other's company and conversation.
Two news editors left messages on my answering machine to apologize for being held up at the last minute and wish to make up for it by inviting me for an interview next week.
One might well think all this is a promising start.
With all good wishes

July 14, 2008
Here is the English version of Swetlana's and Walter's summary-report on their meeting with Andrew Reed of the Office of MEP Nigel Farage. An Italian version will be sent to Paolo's group, later on. Rudy

Summary report on the meeting with Mr Andrew Reed, assistant to Mr Nigel Farage, MEP, from UKIP ( United Kingdom Independence and Democracy Party) on July 8th, 2008 in the Europarliament Low Building in Strasbourg, France, from 1.45 p.m to 3.10 p.m.

Our chat with Mr Andrew Reed could be summed up with the above title. Unfortunately, the delegation of the Strasbourg demonstration,Mrs Swetlana Schunin and myself,Walter Madliger could not speak to Mr Nigel Farage, MEP personally, but he came by for a short while, just to greet us. Mr Andrew Reed not only confirmed the title of this article, but he was also critical of the EU policy, whose relationship with the citizens is generally too impersonal. He explained the mechanisms of political power and their influences on democracy. He gave us an outline of the abuse of power which is easily possible in a democracy and is more and more widespread. This, of course, is very alarming.

The abuse of power is the essence of moral evil. Moral evil occurs, when the authorities refuse to accept the responsibility for the welfare of those who are logically under their care. When there is no close ties with the citizens, moral evil and tort are common practice. The abuse of power is the telltale sign of democracies in crisis. We are governed by a distant political elite,which has lost all contact with the people.

Nobody than we, the victims of mindcontrol and electronic harassment , could have agreed more.

While Mr Andrew Reed tried to make us understand his position and his problems, we tried to get a word in and present our own problems. He asked about the whys and wherefores of this control of the psyche, when it had occured and how it had impacted on us. We gave him a few examples and an update of psychophysical means and weapons, and of the existing laws on their misuse. He took down notes of all this.

In my opinion , he was very well aware of all these means and weapons, and even of the laws, but he did not show how much aware he was. He also seemed to let us understand he has very scarce knowledge of the HAARP issue and the EU-Resolution A4-0005/99, although the UK is one of the most important states, which have participated in the similar EISCAT installations in Norway. He made no comments on our allegations that England used mindcontrol technology in the Northern Ireland Conflict and on the island itself, Greenham Commons in 1988.

We talked about the development and the proliferation of Non-lethal Weapons and the international symposia in Ettlingen, Germany. When we asked him about a possible specific reaction of the EU-Parliament to the problems under discussion, (e.g. in the form of a specific EU-resolution), he could not promise us that he would be able to organize and form a subcommittee for this purpose, nor even a subcommittee for the investigation of our allegations and complaints.

The assenting votes of quite a few delegates would be needed and the party's fraction in the EU-Parliament would be just a bit too small. Whether this statement was 100% true, I doubt a bit, as the overall number of the so-called “Eurosceptics” fraction amounts to 37 , to the best of my knowledge.

In other words, a specific EU-Resolution regarding mindcontrol means and electronic harassment weapons is not yet in sight. Apparently, there is some “understanding” of our complaints, but in the end nobody is willing to really do something about it.

The question we have to ask ourselves is what will everything be like, if we ask the politicians and the governments to forbid and stop the use of the weapons in question on human beings. They are, right now, lining their greedy pockets with a quick profit, they are, right now, making their dictatorial dreams come true . So who wants to kill the goose that lays the golden eggs?

At the end of the meeting, we handed out information material to Mr Andrew Reed ( books of Jim Keith and Mr Gehring and additional info-material, the Smirnov-DVD ). It remains to be seen whether or not Mr Reed will have a look at them. When we pointed out that the fate and the whole future of our children are at stake, Mr Reed agreed and was quite impressed.

At least, the European Parliament has now been informed by a first hand source. Now, they know that there exist citizens who want to fight for the issue and for their most fundamental Human Rights. This issue and that of getting the delegates to support our cause should now be our most important goal.

Here's the English version of Swetlana's report written in German. More to come later. Rudy


The demonstration of European victims took place under the motto "against human experiments with psychophysical weapons" in the French city of Strasburg in front of the European Parliament building on July 7th and at the Council of Europe on July 8th, 2008. One week before the demonstration, we sent information to several editorial staff and TV channels in Strasburg and in other cities of France and Europe. And they did come to the Europarliament on July 7th to support us! The aim of the demonstration was to call the attention of the parliamentarians and the population of Strasburg, to arouse their interest and to ask a press coverage of the issue. In addition, we demanded an extension of the European weapon law which forbids the illegal trading, the illegal possession and the illegal use of psychophysical weapons.

We demanded that an appropriate law put a stop to all kinds of abuse by criminal organisations, and by the military and Secret Services . The organizers of this demonstration in Strasburg were: Swetlana Schunin and Christina Marx from Germany, and Walter Madliger from Switzerland. We have provided flyers in English and German and made posters with the following slogans:

1. Governments are incapable of fighting electromagnetic terror!
2. You might become a victim!
3. Stop psycho-experiments on innocent human beings, immediately!
4. Abusive irradiation technologies on citizens!
5. Prohibition of the control of human subconsciousness!
6. We must put an end to a terrible genocide!
7. Secret services and state criminals are carrying out their experiments remotely!
8. Stop military-medical experiments on peaceful citizens!
9. Brutal tortures and secret murders of innocent people in many countries!
10. Dr. V. Agischev is the criminal head of the "Skvortsova-Stepanova" psychiatric hospital in St. Petersburg!

We called hundreds of European and German victims and emailed lots of invitations. Many victims could not join us for health and financial reasons. But they all sent us short messages saying their thoughts were with us. So, a relatively small number of victims turned up at the demonstration.
We all met at 9.30 a.m on Monday, July 7th in front of the Europarliament. 22 victims altogether turned up from all Europe: 10 from Germany, 3 from Italy, 2 from Russia, 2 from Belgium, 2 from Switzerland, 1 from Austria, 1 from France and 1 from Spain/Morocco. Two supporters from Strasburg joined in with the group later. All demonstrators spared neither time nor efforts throughout the 2-day demonstration. We managed to hand out 800 info sheets to the passers-by, to the parliamentarians and to the tourists in front of the Europarliament and the Council of Europe buildings. Many citizens did show an interest in our problem and some others already knew about this crime.

On Monday 7th, about 11 a.m, two reporters of French TV Channel FR3 came to support us and to make an interview . Some activists told them about this worldwide crime.The press took great interest in our situation. We, therefore, hope that they will give accurate coverage of the whole event. We were particularly impressed at seeing Italian and Moroccan activists Paola Sbronzeri, Paolo Dorigo and Fouzia stopping the cars on the street and handing out flyers to the drivers. Throughout the two-day demonstration our posters helped the passers-by and prospective supporters to understand the whys and wherefores of our action. Although the Secret Services and the French CRS police armed to the teeth controlled our demonstration from start to finish, everything went off quite smoothly.
On the second day, from 10 o'clock onwards we once again informed the tourists, drivers and passers-by at the Council of Europe building. Our posters had a very big effect on the passers-by. In the afternoon, as agreed, Swetlana Schunin and Walter Madliger had a one-hour audience with Andrew Reed of the office of MEP Nigel Paul Farage. We think that this meeting is a promising start for all of us. The central issue is that we were able to call the attention and to arouse the interest of the parliamentarians, the press, the Strasburgers and the foreign tourists with only 24 demonstrators.

The work we did all together throughout the two-day event inspired us and other victims to organise even bigger demonstrations in the future. This European demonstration in Strasburg has shown that we can defeat these brutal barbarians only by joining all our forces. We all think it was a big success. And we had the pleasure of sharing our experiences and of enjoying each other's company in a friendly atmosphere. We will carry on with our common action to save everyone of us from these sadists' cruel tortures, we will keep on fighting so that every man and every child on the planet can live and sleep quietly without tortures and psychological terror!

The organizer of the Strasburg demonstration and president of the "Association Against the Abuse of Psychophysical Weapons"
Swetlana Schunin

from RUDY - 3/7/08

1. A few contacted authorities did not follow through into further help other than the initial promise of support .
2. Many of them fizzled out .
3. Some "people" got to them to block their continued help or...
4. Some decided they do not wish to get further involved .

We had loads of potential help. For various reasons many of them backed out.

So here is the situation:-
a) We had to deal with lots of "pies-in-the- sky", "lip-service- experts", "just-hot-air" and "just-for- show" people.
b) Lots of them were just "deaf-ears".
c) Many backed out for more or less mysterious reasons
d) Some were " experts in arrogance "
e) Some did try to do their best
f) Some confessed they couldn't do much

Spanish Journalist Rafael Palacio
Rowena Thursby of UK KIG

IX. And now, the GOOD news
1.Six European journalists have agreed to have a meeting with me in Paris, early September 2008. The date is still to be arranged.
2. All the news editors who came to the Strasburg demo in July 2008 agree to follow through into further help.


Dear Mr Finch
The Archbishop of Melbourne is currently overseas and will be away for some weeks ahead.
In his absence I am responding to your letter of the 7th July.
I note the concerns your letter raises and have read the attachments you provided.
Your immediate request was for access to a safe house, as a place of protection from the the things you have been experiencing. Unfortunately we do not have the resources to address the general issues you raise, nor are we able to provide you with acess to the type of accomodation you require.
I trust you may be able to find the help you need through some other line of enquiry.

Grace & peace in Christ Jesus
Yours sincerely
The The Right Reverend John Noble, Vicar General Diocese Of Melbourne,

17. MR NIGEL FARRAGE, MEMBER OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT, from UKIP ( United Kingdom Independence and Democracy Party), BRUSSELS, EUROPE 28/7/08

Subject: UKIP-response to FAMCE-delegation
Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 16:27:12 +0200

Dear Monika and Rudy

Three weeks ago, as you know, a FAMCE-delegation, consisting of Swetlana Schunin and Walter Madliger, was received at the UKIP-offices in the LOW-building of the EU's consultative assembly, at Strasbourg, and submitted certain documents, with a view to promoting awareness of the need to monitor and control a range of electronic weapons, which, according to numerous reports, have been under development for several decades and have been used, covertly, in various parts of the world, to the discomfort and distress of many people.

Most notable, among the documents submitted - because it comes, as it were, from the horse's mouth - is the programme of the "4th European Symposium on Non-Lethal Weapons 2007", held by the "European Working Group on Non-Lethal Weapons" (EWG-NLW) at the Stadthalle, in Ettlingen, Germany.

This programme, containing as it does, such items as "Software and Hardware of Instrumentation for Human-State Control in the Influence-Field of Microwave Radiation", "Psychological Effects of Non-Lethal Weapons: a new Approach for Defining more Effective Uses" and "Bio-Impulse: a Research Program to Study the Effects of Nanosecond Electromagnetic Pulses on Biological Cells", bears out the studies and anecdotal evidence, submitted by the delegation, to the extent that research into electronic weapons, for the purposes of effecting pain, injury and mind-manipulation, is certainly going on.

Furthermore, judging by the sources of the presentations made at the symposium, most of this research is proceeding in the EU, the USA and Russia. Note too that, at this same symposium (on 23rd May, item V27) the International Committee of the Red Cross sponsored a presentation on the subject of "Ensuring the protection of Civilians and Respect for International Humanitarian Law".

The delegation did not mention that the EWG-NLW is now preparing for its "5th European Symposium on Non-Lethal Weapons 2009" - also to be held at the Stadthalle in Ettlingen - and is appealing for prospective presenters, either of discussions (25 mins) or of posters, to send in their abstracts before the 1st October.

If FAMCE has not done so, I would recommend that it submit an abstract for this symposium - as the Red Cross successfully did, last year - in order to promote awareness of the themes of its campaign among those who know most about the technology, which FAMCE alleges is being mis-used. EWG-NLG's response to such an application might be informative; and, even if the application is unsuccessful, FAMCE should attempt, at least, to attend the symposium in order to gather intelligence.

EWG-NLW's website (URL given above) states that "The working Group is open to all European organizations working in the area of Non-Lethal Weapons", so, unless the membership-fee is prohibitively high, I do not see why FAMCE should not join the working-group as a full member, get closer to the sources (which remain tantalisingly vague) of the problems it identifies, and develop a voice within a forum, which will be able to appreciate, better than any other, the significance of what it is saying.

As for the wider political context, in which electronic weapons are being developed, I would have thought it quite clear that the real danger to democracy, the rule of law and the rights of the individual, comes, not from the weapons themselves (knives and clubs can be used just as secretly and unattributably as electronic weapons) but from the erosion of democracy by supranational organisations, such as the EU, and clandestine, politico-commercial influences, such as the Council on Foreign Relations and the Royal Institute of International Affairs (Chatham House)

I agree completely with the opening chapters of Jim Keith's "Mass Control: Engineering Human Consciousness", which the delegation gave me, and which describes the grip exerted on US-policy by surreptitious societies, large corporations and secret agencies, and the sinister data-gathering programmes of the (not yet quite sovereign) EU. The restoration of democracy, under these circumstances, is the only possible answer to misconduct by these various, sinister entities. Even passing laws, like the ones now "in force", against the mis-use of electronic weapons, in some US-states, is completely ineffective as long as governments and courts remain under the undue influence of special interests, whether commercial or supranational.

Persuasive too is Heiner Gehring's book "Versklavte Gehirne", which the delegation also gave me, and which charts the control and misuse of the mass-media by the governments and other entities described above, showing that the restoration of democracy - through the decision of informed electorates - can only be achieved if the dis-information, propagated by an oligarchy of media-chains, can somehow be countered.

This is the essential business of the UK Independence Party (UKIP) and its supporters, among whom, therefore, I should like to count the FAMCE.

Even so, it may be possible to influence the situation for the better, by exposing the abuse of electronic weapons, if attacks of this kind can be clearly documented and liability can be clearly established. The confused anecdotes of people, who claim to have been rendered mentally ill by such attacks, are, by their very nature, ambiguous and unreliable, and must be supported by some kind of concrete evidence. When such evidence does emerge, UKIP's representatives in the Houses of Parliament in London (rather than those in the EU's sham counterpart in Brussels) will be well-placed to present it, and I shall certainly assist them in doing so.

Meanwhile, if you have specific questions, which our Westminster-representatives can usefully put to government-ministers, I would be pleased to relay these to them; but action in the EU's institutions is virtually impossible. Written questions to the EU-Commission receive bland replies after several weeks. An independent Political Group, such as ours, is effectively prevented from tabling items for the plenary agenda, and "MEP's", who are not supporters of the régime, are treated, in general, with contempt and are ignored. All of this helps to demonstrate the EU's inherently anti-democratic structure, which should not be appealed to, under any circumstances, because doing so would imply recognition of a legitimacy it does not possess.

For us, the EU-assembly provides a platform for publicity in Britain, and nothing more. It does not influence the EU's essential powers (as the fate of the Resolution of 1999, against the mis-use of electronic weapons, demonstrates) but, on all matters of moment, merely echoes the EU-Commission. As a platform, however - and lacking any other, as we did until three years ago, when we first obtained representation at Westminster - it has been invaluable to us, and will probably continue to be so, for some time.

Now that we have made contact, and begun to work together, therefore, I look forward to maintaining a fruitful association with FAMCE.

Yours sincerely
Andrew S. Reed


From: Marilyn Stefanile
Date: Aug 1, 2008 10:20 AM
Subject: Email from Peter O'Callaghan

Dear Mr Finch

I have received your email expressing your complaints in relation to the matters referred to.

I confirm that I am the Independent Commissioner appointed by the Archdiocese of Melbourne to enquire into allegations of sexual abuse by priests, religious and lay persons within the Archdiocese of Melbourne.

I note your serious concerns, but they do not fall within my jurisdiction. I sympathise with your concerns, but am unable to assist you.

Yours sincerely
Peter J O'Callaghan - Independent Commissioner
Telephone: 9225 7979


On Thursday, Tim in New York met with State Senator Eric Adams, a boyhood friend of his who is has recently met with some TI's regarding our issues. I wrote about him in the newsletter a couple of weeks ago. He has been reviewing informational material from us for the past 2-3 weeks.

In the meeting, Rep. Adams stated that he wants to hold hearings concerning OS/EH harassment in February. He's asking that we send a brief summary of our harassment for his review to: The hearing is open to the public. Therefore, anyone anywhere in New York state, the country or the globe can give their testimony or attend. For clarity and time considerations he is reviewing the summaries submitted for testimony. The location for the hearing will be New York City. The exact address has not been determined. We'll of course have a group of expert witnesses to address the senators about the technology and the psychology of the abuses as well. We've provided him a suggested list of experts who have expressed their willingness to testify. Those people he plans to contact and interview personally.

He also mentioned that he wants media involvement, which he could generate. And that this hearing would be the start of spinoff hearings in other states and would ultimately result in a congressional hearing.

It would certainly be beneficial if there were some other state representatives that could work with him on this hearing. Hopefully, we will find others who will come forward to lend their support to these issues.

One last comment: Scheduling of the hearing is the first step. Completing the hearing is the goal. And 5 1/2 months to go gives the stalkers plenty of time for mischief. Those that were around last year will remember the television show that we were all counting on, only to have it cancelled just days before taping. And the Firecracker Films documentary that never materialized. And numerous television and newspaper reporters that contacted us and never heard from again. So we've got to remember that something of this magnitude may encounter perp interference. What I'm suggesting is that for all who are believers that we need to remain in prayer for this event - for Senator Adams and for the success of the hearing. Also keep in mind that the month of February in New York could bring issues with the weather, which the perps have been known to bring on at just the exact time. So please keep all these things in mind as we pray, and pray believing. Personally, my belief is that we can only succeed in this struggle with God's help. A word to the wise is sufficient.
All this will be discussed at the conference call this Saturday night. And if there's time, Dale Wahl will join us to talk about his project.

For further questions or comments about the state hearing, please contact Tim in New York at:

September 13, 2008 by Rudy Andria

Only 3 lawyers turned up, the other 3 were held up at their offices at the last moment and briefly chatted with us on the phone.

1.They all know about the existence of various technological means which violate the fundamental human rights of innocent people , they know the existence of non lethal weapons and of highly sophisticated psychological pressures.

2.They do not have the slightest doubt about some governments' participation in influencing or even destroying the free will of some people.

3.They know that the exposure of such practices usually provokes sniggering and those who dare to complain are either made fun of or accused of paranoia.
Paranoia , of course, does exist and as it is characterized by an excessive mistrust of other people's acts or an excessive mistrust of power, it affects every social relationship and makes it possible to justify exclusion .

4.Utmost rigour and precision are therefore required when exposing the attacks on the victims' integrity, privacy and freedom of thought by invisible means. .
It is only by building up impeccable fact-files supported by official reports and scientific studies that public opinion worldwide can be sensitized and made aware of the problem.
It is only under these conditions of rigour and precision that the 3 lawyers present will agree to put the case for the defence.

The 3 lawyers all agreed on the following points:
Our difficulty is that we have practically no legal evidence of the attacks, so we have to make do with:
a) statistics
b) similarities in symptoms and experiences
c) similarities of torture cases
d) existence of weapons'patents
e) existence of the technology patents for the use of V2K
f) complicity of a number of psychiatrists worldwide
G) the highly probable involvement of many governments ( two lawyers referred to the example of helicopters and said that not many people can afford to maintain aircrafts. Flights are logged and the airspace they are in is recorded).

Rudy Andria
September 13, 2008

I've forgotten to add 1 point: the 3 lawyers think that our first help should come from the parliamentarians, because they are the ones who make the laws.

21. INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT – The Office of the Prosecutor

INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT – The Office of the Prosecutor
Our Reference: OTP-CR-70/07
The Hague, Monday, 29 September 2008

Dear Sir/Madam

On behalf of the Prosecutor, I thank you for your communication received 21/2/2007, as well as any subsequent related information.

As you may know, the International Criminal Court (“the ICC” or “the Court”) is governed by the Rome Statute, which entrusts the court with a very specific and carefully defined jurisdiction and mandate. A fundamental feature of the Rome Statute is that the Court may only exercise jurisdiction over persons for the most serious crimes of concern to the international community as a whole, namely genocide, crimes against humanity and war crimes, as defined in the Rome Statute (Articles 6 to 8). The Court may only exercise jurisdiction over crimes committed on or after 1 July 2002 (Article 11). In addition, the Court may only exercise jurisdiction over crimes committed on the territory of a State that has accepted the jurisdiction of the Court or by a national of such a State (Article 12), or where the Security Council refers the situation to the Court 9Article 13).

Accordingly, I regret to advise you that your communication appears to relate to matters outside the jurisdiction of the Court. The Prosecutor has therefore confirmed that there is not a basis at this time to proceed with further analysis. The information you have submitted will be maintained in our archives, and the decision not to proceed may be reconsidered if new facts or evidence provide a reasonable basis to believe that a crime the jurisdiction of the Court has been committed.

I hope you will appreciate that with the defined jurisdiction of the Court, many serious allegations will be beyond the reach of this institution to address, I note in this regard that the ICC is designed to complement, not replace national jurisdictions. Thus, if you wish to pursue this matter further, you may consider raising it with other appropriate national or international authorities.

I am grateful for your interest in the ICC. If you would like to learn more about the work of the ICC, I invite you to visit our website at .

John Finch
5/8 Kemp Street, Thornbury, Vic, 3071, Australia

Yours sincerely

M.P. Dillon
Head of the Information & Evidence Unit
Office of the Prosecutor

Post Office Box 19519, 2500 CM The Hague, The Netherlands
TEL: 31-70-5158515 FAX: 31-70-5158555


P.O. BOX 412, KING CITY, MO 64463
Tel: 660-535-6664

To Whom It May Concern:

I have worked for 3 years with Microwave and Electronic Harassment victims throughout the US and overseas. It is hard for others to understand the technology that is being used to destroy people’s lives. I know James because he contacted me for help. James has worked to find proof of what has happened to him.

Many victims try hard to get help from professional doctors to help find devices such as Veri-Chip. I would request that you and those who can make a difference would help James and others to find answers.

5th District State Representative


Dear Mr. Finch,

I wish to acknowledge receipt of your e-mail of 3 October 2008 which will be brought to the Taoiseach's attention as soon as possible.

Yours sincerely,

David King
Assistant Private Secretary to the Taoiseach

Telephone: 01-6194020
E-mail: , ,

The Department of the Taoiseach is committed to providing a professional, efficient and courteous service to all our customers. To view the Customer Charter, please click on

23. MR NIGEL FARRAGE, MEMBER OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT, from UKIP ( United Kingdom Independence and Democracy Party), BRUSSELS, EUROPE 30/1/09

Dear Mr Finch

Thank you for this account of your hideous experiences and the technology, which might have been used to occasion them.

The UK Independence Party is supporting the initiative, by Dr Walter Madlinger, to demonstrate such matters to an expert audience, at the Ettlingen Conference on Non-Lethal Weapons, on 11th May, this year, and I would encourage you to attend, if you are not already planning to do so.

Yours sincerely
Andrew S. Reed
(Office of Nigel Farage, Brussels)


Dear John,

Thank you for speaking out against the abuse of the "state secrets" doctrine. We know your time is limited, and we appreciate your efforts to protect civil liberties.

The ACLU works daily in courts, legislatures and communities to defend and preserve individual rights and liberties that the Constitution and laws of the United States guarantee everyone in this country. We need your support now more than ever as we work to restore liberties lost over the last eight years. If you have a moment, please make a donation today. Visit

Thanks again for taking action. We'll keep you up-to-date on this important legislation.

Anthony D. Romero
Executive Director, ACLU



Dear Sir (Mr John Finch)

I am writing in reply of your email of 9 April 2009 in which you come back on your earlier complaint 1568/2006/(AVM)OV.

You allege that some extreme and horrendous criminality is being conducted by agencies related to the US government with the complicity of many other government and security agencies. You state that victims as you are being subjected to torture and mental and physical destruction and that this has remained completely unreported. You state that, more particularly, you are being completely mutilated and neutralised by electro-magnetic radiation and that you are “brain-broadcasted”.

As I already informed you in my letters of 22 June and 14 September 2006, I have unfortunately no power to intervene in this matter, because your allegations are not directed against a European Union institution or body.

However given that you are residing in Australia, I would like to repeat my earlier advice that, in case you have an allegation against an Australian government agency, you might consider contacting the Australian Ombudsman:

Commonwealth Ombudsman
National Office
GPO Box 442, Canberra ACT 2601
Ground Floor, I Farrell Place
Canberra City ACT 2600

I regret I cannot be of further assistance.

Yours sincerely,

The European Ombudsman
1 Ave President Robert Schumann – CS 30403 – F-67001 strasbourg Cedex
TEL: 33 (0)3.88.172313 – fax: 33 (0)3.88.179062 –


EA1470971 – HSJB

Dear Mr Finch

The Premier has received your recent email concerning your reported experiences in Russia, Turkey and China.

As the subject you have raised primarily relates to areas of Australian Government responsibility, Mr Rees is unable to be of direct assistance.

Accordingly, the opportunity has been taken to bring the terms of your approach to the attention of the Australian Government.

Yours sincerely
Emanuel Sklavounos
for Director General


Prof. Dr. Adrian Eugen Hollaender,
Chairman of The Austrian Fundamental Rights Conference,
Human Rights Seminar Instructor at the University of Vienna

Dear Mr. Finch:


If you wish, I could examine the case under the legal perspective and write a legal expertise on it that you can use in the complaint procedures.

Prof. Hollaender



Dear Sir (Mr John Finch)

I am writing in reply to your emails of 10, 11, 17 and 18 August 2009 in which you come back on your earlier complaint 1568/2006/(AVM)OV concerning your “directed energy and neurological weapons torture, degradation and mutilation case” you also sent me a “list of the crimes committed by the NWO criminals”.

As I already informed you in my letters 22 June and 14 September 2006, and 8 May 2009, I unfortunately have no power to intervene in this matter.

I regret that I cannot be of further assistance to you in this case

Yours sincerely,

The European Ombudsman
1 Ave President Robert Schumann – CS 30403 – F-67001 strasbourg Cedex
TEL: 33 (0)3.88.172313 – fax: 33 (0)3.88.179062 –


REF: MF/MK (2010/01/07)

Dear Mr Finch

Further to our recent meeting, I have written to the Attorney General, Robert McClelland requesting that your suspicion about constant monitoring of your life by ASIO and the Australian Federal Police be investigated.

You will be advised of any response I receive from the Attorney General.

Best wishes for 2010

Yours sincerely
Federal Member for Batman, Minister for Resource and Energy, Minister for Tourism


Correspondence reference: 2010/505
File reference: 2009/62
24 March 2010

Mr John Finch,

Dear Mr Finch

Thank you for your email of 16 March 2010 asking for protection from surveillance, torture and abuse. I have read your email and note that you believe you are being tortured and abused by ‘directed energy and neuroligical weapons’ by United States government agencies with the complicity of other governments and security agencies.

Before responding to your specific concerns, it is appropriate that I inform you a little about the role and functions of my office.

The Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security (IGIS) has general oversight responsibilities for each of the six Australian intelligence agencies. The Australian Security Intelligence Organisation (ASIO) is Australia’s domestic security agency and is therefore the Australian intelligence agency most likely to have interaction with Australian persons. The focus of ASIO’s work is on countering terrorism, discouraging people who may act violently for political reasons, and discouraging people who seek to clandestinely obtain sensitive government information or otherwise harm Australia’s interests in order to further their own causes or the interests of foreign governments.

Other ASIO functions include collecting foreign intelligence within Australia, and providing security assessments and protective security advice.

Based on my experience as IGIS for nearly six years, I can assure you that neither ASIO nor any agency within the Australian Intelligence Community (AIC) has the resources, motivation or legal authority to harm individuals in the way you describe.

I am confident in making this assertion because ASIO and the other AIC agencies are each subjected to intensive and frequent review by this office, to ensure that they conduct their business within the bounds of the law, and in a professional and ethical manner. I can also assure you that the inspection regime undertaken by my office is very thorough.

You have also raised the possibility that a foreign intelligence service might be involved in the activities you described. ASIO has a functional interest in monitoring any such activity, and in turn my office closely examines ASIO’s activities in this area. On the basis of the material available to me, I do not believe that they are negligent in this regard.

I should also tell you that I do not have any jurisdiction over any foreign intelligence services, but despite this would regard it as highly improbable that they would target any member of the Australian public who is simply going about their ordinary business.

While I don’t doubt that you have experienced a range of issues that are of concern to you, none of the AIC agencies have the capabilities or motivation to do what you describe.

If you believe you have been the subject of a crime, you have the option of discussing this with your local police.

While my office is unable to directly assist you, I nonetheless hope that the above information is both helpful and reassuring to you.

On behalf of
Ian Carnell, Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security

Office of the Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security
P +61 2 6271 5692 | F +61 2 6271 5696 |

Directorate A Registry

Dear Mr Finch

I am writing in reply to your email of 1st March in which you complained about alleged acts of torture by electronic weapons and mutilations on certain people ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..
Having concluded that your complaint is outside the European Ombudsman’s mandate, I wish you every success in finding a positive outcome to the matter you raised in your complaint.

Yours Sincerely
Peter Bonnor
Head of Registry
European Ombudsman

On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 10:59 PM, Euro-Ombudsman wrote:

Dear Mr Murray,
I am writing in reply to your e-mail of 19 April 2012 in which you asked for help in your matter concerning among others mind control.
I would like to inform you that the role of the European Ombudsman is to investigate complaints alleging maladministration in the activities of the European institutions, bodies, offices and agencies, such as the European Commission and the European Parliament. No action by any other authority or person may be the subject of a complaint to the Ombudsman. Only EU citizens or residents in the territory of the Union may lodge a complaint with the European Ombudsman (Art. 2 (2) of the Statute of the European Ombudsman.
From the above also follows that the Ombudsman is not in a position to help you in your matter, since it does not fall within his mandate.
I hope this information suits you well.
Best regards,
European Ombudsman
Zuzana Vaníčková
T. +33 (0)3 88 17 23 28
1 avenue du Président Robert Schuman, CS 30403, F - 67001 Strasbourg Cedex
T. + 33 (0)3 88 17 23 13
F. + 33 (0)3 88 17 90 62

From: joe murray []
Sent: 26 April 2012 03:27
To: Euro-Ombudsman
Subject: Re: Please help us to get this electronic torture, abuse and experimentation stopped

thanks - I'm an EU (UK) citizen and I'm complaining about maladministration in the EU Instititutions and Agencies that are supposed to protect us from these tortures and abuses.

For example the ECHR and EUROPOL.

john finch

From: Euro-Ombudsman
Date: Thu, May 10, 2012 at 6:39 PM
Subject: RE: Please help us to get this electronic torture, abuse and experimentation stopped
To: joe murray

Dear Mr Finch,

Thank you for your further e-mail. From the information provided, it is not clear what are exactly your allegation(s) and claim(s) and against which institutions you wish to complaint against.
I would like to reiterate in this regards that complaint concerning ECHR is outside the Ombudsman's remit. Please note, in this regard, that the European Court of Human Rights was established by the European Convention on Human Rights, signed by the Member States of the Council of Europe. The European Court of Human Rights was not created by or under the EU Treaties and, consequently, it is not a European Union institution, body, office or agency. The European Ombudsman is therefore not entitled to deal with complaints against the European Court of Human Rights.
Should you nevertheless wish to complain to the Ombudsman, you are free to do so. However, please note that the complaint shall be made within two years of the date on which the facts on which it is based came to the attention of the person lodging the complaint and must be preceded by the appropriate administrative approaches to the institutions and bodies concerned (Art. 2 (4) of the Statute of the European Ombudsman). Moreover, the facts of the complaint must not be, or have been, subject to judicial proceedings (Art. 1 (3) of the Statute of the European Ombudsman).
If these criteria are fulfilled and you wish to complain against an EU institution, you could consider using the form for complaints, available on the Ombudsman's website:
I hope you will find this information useful.
European Ombudsman
Zuzana Vaníčková
T. +33 (0)3 88 17 23 28
1 avenue du Président Robert Schuman, CS 30403, F - 67001 Strasbourg Cedex
T. + 33 (0)3 88 17 23 13
F. + 33 (0)3 88 17 90 62

32. The Office for Human Research Protections (OHRP), KRISTINA BORROR, DIRECTOR, 25/4/12
Borror, Kristina C (HHS/OASH)
25 April 2012 03:50

Dear Mr. Child

The Office for Human Research Protections (OHRP) has received your June 28, 2011, January 15, and April 18, 2012 emails regarding electronic torture, abuse and experimentation.

OHRP has responsibility for oversight of compliance with the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) regulations for the protection of human research subjects (see 45 CFR Part 46 at In carrying out this responsibility, OHRP evaluates, at OHRP’s discretion, substantive allegations of noncompliance involving human subject research projects conducted or supported by HHS or that are otherwise subject to the regulations (see OHRP memorandum dated October 14, 2009 at for an explanation of OHRP’s jurisdiction).

OHRP has jurisdiction only if the allegations involve human subject research (a) conducted or supported by HHS, or (b) conducted at an institution holding an applicable Assurance of Compliance with the HHS regulations.

Neither of these conditions appear to be met by the circumstances described in your letter. Therefore, OHRP will not be able to pursue the matter on your behalf.

OHRP appreciates your concern about the protection of human research subjects.

Kristina C. Borror, Ph.D.
Director, Division of Compliance Oversight


On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 9:21 PM, wrote:

Dear John,
Many thanks for your email.

We regret to inform you that Amnesty International is unable to offer you any assistance as your case does not fall within our areas of work.

We do understand your concerns and desire that action be taken. However, our work is determined by the framework established by Amnesty International members at a global level, and all individual cases that we work on must fall within the terms established by our statute. This does not mean that we consider certain types of human rights, or human rights abuses, to be more important than others. Nor does it mean that we have reached any conclusion as to whether you may have been the victim of a human rights violation. Rather, it means that we must, to be as effective as possible, channel our limited resources towards those areas of work which we have identified as priorities.

We regret that we are unable to assist you, and we do understand the disappointment this must cause. However, we hope you are able to understand the reasons behind this. We do hope that you are able to find the help that you need elsewhere, and that your situation improves.

If you wish to check which kinds of cases Amnesty International can deal with, please check our web page locatedat:

Sorry we are not able to be of further assistance in this matter.

The Communications Team.

Date: 05/07/2012 04:58
Subject: [Website: contact us] electronic torture,abuse and experimentation
Sent by:,


Erminia Mazzoni
Chairman, Committee on Petitions
European Parliament
B-1047 Brussels
tel: 32 2 2842111
fax: 32 2 2846844


I acknowledge the receipt of your recent correspondence dated 14/6/12 to the Committee on Petitions.

This will be added to the file of Mr Babacek on alleged use of mind control systems in the EU

(they then included this copy of the letter sent to Mr Mojmir Babacek on 19/7/12)

Dear Mr Babacek

Thank you for having submitted your petition to the European Parliament for its consideration. It was examined in order to assess whether the issue which you raise, falls clearly within the fields of activity of the European Union for which we are competent.

Unfortunately, I have to inform you that this was not the case, and I am therefore obliged to file your request without being able to take matters any further, pursuant to Article 201 (8) of our Rules of Procedure.

yours sincerely





In fear of such fearless actions of the Japanese soldiers based on their religious beliefs, when WWII was over, the Headquarters of the Allied Occupation of Japan implemented “reform” to neutralize the religions of the Japanese (Woodard, 1972). One of the symbolic revisions is changing the names of holidays in Japan. For example, the venal and autumn equinoctial festivals days--Mar. 21 and Sep. 21 respectively-- were renamed “Shunbun-no-hi(春分の日)” and “Shubun-no-hi.” Traditionally, these holidays were called “Higan (彼岸).” Higan is a Buddhist term which literally means “the other shore.” It implies the place where deceased people live. Thus, to avoid association with religious belief, the holidays’ name was altered to more neutral one as “Spring/Autumnal Equinox Day.” Woodard (1972) reports in his book that official documents and testimonies suggest that the Headquarters of the Allied Occupation of Japan even attempted to Christianize Japan.

Religion and Ethnicity in COINTELPRO Crisis『拝啓 ギャングストーカー犯罪者の皆様』

【Case Study】




状況から判断すると、上記テイラー氏の指摘するような「暗殺」を狙ったものである可能性が高いだろうと思いました。英語圏ではこのような殺害方法は「Soft Killing」や「 Slow Killing」などと俗に呼ばれ知られています(Welsh)。
















     『ブッダの人と思想』中村元 他









cointelpro mk ultra

Author:cointelpro mk ultra
The writer of 『拝啓 日本のギャングストーカー犯罪者の皆様』(Dear COINTELPRO Criminals) <集団ストーカーの死> (The Death of COINTELPRO Stalkers), and "Unprecedented Human Rights Violation" Discussion Room / Study Room. Also a co-editor of 「新しいタイプの人権侵害・暴力」(Unprecedented Human Rights Violation)

Latest journals
Latest comments
Monthly archive
Search form
Display RSS link.
Friend request form

Want to be friends with this user.

QR code